病人自評之醫療人員溝通能力評估工具 [Psychometric properties]

Scale	Reliability	Validity
1. Communication Assessment Tool (CAT)- Makoul (2007)	Internal consistency Ÿ Cronbach’s alpha = 0.98 (15 items) Ÿ Cronbach's alpha: 0.96 (14 items)	Ÿ Face validity: Lexile analysis for readability Ÿ Content validity: expert review, national survey (70%), focus group Ÿ Structural validity (EFA/CFA): 1 factor (78.8% of the variance) Ÿ Predictive validity: patient satisfaction 區辨效度??? (待閱讀釐清)
2. Modified version of the Perceived Involvement in Care Scale (M-PICS)- Smith (2006)	Internal consistency Ÿ Cronbach’s alpha (total) = 0.87; (item) alpha = 0.80 -0.90 (English version) Ÿ Cronbach’s alpha (item)= 0.76-0.86 (Spanish version)	Ÿ Structural validity (EFA-PCA)- 4 factor Ÿ Construct validity Convergent validity 1.     BQ = -0.10- -0.56 2.     MHI-SF = -0.04- -0.32 3.     MCS = 0.07-0.35 4.     PCS = -0.06-0.20 5.     PSQ= - 0.03- 0.80 Convergent validity還分析了M-PICS與age, Latina, socioeconomic status的相關係數??? (待概念釐清)
3. Matched-pair instrument (MPI)- Campbell (2007)	Internal consistency Ÿ Cronbach’s alpha = 0.69 與摘要數據不一致	Structural validity (EFA): 2 factors
4. The Four Habit Patient Questionnaire (4HPQ)- Gulbrandsen (2008)	Internal consistency Ÿ Cronbach’s alpha = 0.895 Physician-level reliability = 0.78 (待概念釐清，文中分析代表意義??)	Structural validity (PCA): 2 factor Ÿ Validity: correlations with general satisfaction and knowledge of the physician
5. Communication skills instruments- Baig (2009)	Intra-item reliability Ÿ Cronbach's alpha = 0.13 – 0.52 (SP)	Ÿ Convergent validity (待閱讀釐清) Ÿ Criterion validity (待閱讀釐清)

Note. 黃色標示文字為待釐清之處，預計先列出明確問題後，下周與老師討論。