***寫作討論修改並非只是將文字做重述，而是要先釐清自己的問題(概念釐清、表達/寫作能力)所在***
本次寫作討論段落[前言]：
Verification of
reliability can determine that the change score is a real change in
individuals rather than a measurement error. That is, a lack of
reliability verification can affect the accuracy of the interpretation of
results (i.e., overestimation or underestimation). Test-retest
reliability refers to the extent of consistency between two assessments of the same construct administered with the same individuals
at two different points in time. If the individuals’ traits to be assessed have
stablized between the two assessments, then the measure is reliable. Random measurement error is due to chance factors that
affect an observed score for an inevitable reason, that is, the magnitude of
the uncertainty around an observed score. Therefore, random measurement error
needs to be addressed as this may affect the reliability measure. The amount of random measurement error
of a measure can be estimated by calculating the standard measurement error (SEM) and minimal
detectable change (MDC). The SEM is a measure of the degree to which measured test
scores are spread around a true score. The MDC is the minimal amount of change between
repeated assessments that indicate a true change beyond the random measurement
error at a certain confidence level (usually 95%).
此為對概念陳述的問題：
[黃底] 這並非信度的「普遍」定義，因此置於前言的段落開頭太過突兀，要記得投稿文章的主要讀者為reviewer!!! 老師協助修改成：”Reliability generally
includes test-retest reliability and the amount of random measurement error.”
- Note. 這樣的修改方式更為簡潔，也同時增加該段落概念(test-retest reliablilty and random measurement error)的鋪成/連貫性。
[藍底] 對test-retest reliability的描述無法凸顯其「對研究的意義與價值」，僅為test-retest reliability的方法陳述。
[綠底] 可將此內容移置方法學章節，讓該段落表達之重點更加明確且簡潔。
此為對寫作/英文撰寫的問題：
沒有留言:
張貼留言